Arizona/San Fran

[Matt (Arizona)]

Arizona trades:
Jeff Hoffman (Prospect)
2015 1st round pick

San Fransisco trades:
Howie Kendrick $2.5M (2016)

gave up more than I wanted to but Kendrick is one of the more underrated fantasy guys out there and if Hoffman and the pick actually turn into anything it wouldn't be for a few years plus it gives me flexibility to possibly move altuve if I have to

[Luis (San Francisco)]

I agree Kendrick is great but his contract is only for 2 years wich I don't think I'm gonna compete it's a long rebuilding process but I'm on the right path

[Gregory (Houston)]

Veto. No chance in hell that Kendrick is worth this much. He had 7 HR, 14 SB, and only a .744 OBP as a 31 y/o.

I wouldn't trade either Hoffman or a 1st for him, but it's the first that makes this a deal breaker for me.

[Dylan (Philly)]

Approve. Fair deal for both Zona is getting a proven player and SF is getting the young players he wants for a rebuild.

[Matt (Chicago)]

approve...very fair deal for both involved. not sure how this is vetoable

[Troy (Toronto)]

It's a bad trade for Arizona. He loses easily.

Approve

[Vik (Seattle)]

Doesn't really matter now but:

Veto

Arizona: Why in the world would you do this? Hoffman is ranked fifth in the Blue Jays farm, and a realistic, attainable projection for him is a high end #2 pitcher. A NUMBER TWO PITCHER. AND YOU TRADE A 2015 1st rounder. That will get you a player of Jeff Hoffman's caliber, if not better. All for a 31 year old 2B playing in LAD where no one knows how long he will hold his starting job and is only signed for two years. You are giving up two players who you will each have for six years (12 total), for two years of a declining 2B. HOW IN THE WORLD IS THIS NOT VETOABLE? This is by far the worst trade I have ever seen in this league, let alone any league. I am utterly dismayed as to why Arizona would do this trade.

[Rich (Miami)]

It was put in 16 hours ago so why are you waiting this long to put in your opinion. When you are the one whow is supposed to be helping troy Vik.

[Jeremy (Minnesota)]

I agree that this trade sucks for Arizona, not worth a veto though in my opinion, ill approve

[Vik (Seattle)]

Mar 13, 2015 2:48:32 GMT Rich (Miami) said:

It was put in 16 hours ago so why are you waiting this long to put in your opinion. When you are the one whow is supposed to be helping troy Vik.

I posted my acceptance five hours (edit: It was actually four hours and fifteen minutes) after the trade was accepted. I'm sorry if I happen to not be online 24/7. Apologies.